Canto 8 of Dante’s Inferno Essay -- Dantes Inferno Essays

In recent discussions of Canto 8 of Dantes Inferno, umpteen scholars have argued ab come out Dante the pilgrims controversial abuse of champion of the wroth sinners of the fifth circle, Filippo Argenti. The altercation between the two is viewed in numerous lights. From one perspective it is seen as unjustified (individual retirement account mala) because Dante is seen as guilty of the sin organism punished for in this circle, but also because his response was falsely motivated. Others state that Dantes anger was righteous (ira bona) because there was proper reasoning fuck it. Kleinhenz, one digressicular scholar, argues that Dantes ebullition at Filippo Argenti is a run of the praise Dante matchd after initially criticizing the sinner. In his book, Inferno 8 The flight Across the Styx, he maintains that Virgils praise is perhaps wrongly motivated and consequently, that Dantes fightion to Fillipo Argenti in this canto is equally erroneous. Kleinhenz alludes to this tra nsmit in his interpretation of Luke 1127, where a woman who is praising messiah is correct in her exaltation of the Mother and Son, but her praise is inappropriate to the situation. By analyzing the parallels between Virgils praise and the biblical verse, Kleinhenz argues that both Virgil and Dantes actions are inappropriate and therefore ira mala. John A. Scott, however, views Dantes outburst as being justified. In his book,Understanding Dante, Scott argues that Florence was very much a part of Dantes life and that Filippo Argenti was an ostentatious man whose arrogance and insolent demo of wealth as well as corrupt nature is viewed synonymously with Florences decline. Therefore Scott argues that Dantes rage was appropriate because it was inspired by the new decadence of Fl... ...is anger can be viewed as ira bona and ira mala simultaneously. Wishing further pain upon Argenti in order to receive further praise from his wise man is an unreasonable excuse, but trying to compel a better pupil and person by doing as his mentor says is reasonable. Becoming furious as a human instinct is rational, whereas doling out punishments while you are only a human is not. Dante did not react to the sinner in the way that he did for only one reason, sort of he had many reasons to respond as he did.Works CitedAlghieri, Dante. Inferno. spic-and-span York Oxford UP, 1996. Print.John A. Scotts Understanding Dante, Univ. of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, 2004 (210-11) Kleinhenz, Christopher. Inferno 8 The Passage Across the Styx. Lectura Dantis. Brown University. No. 3 Fall 1988 21 pars 21 Sept. 2009 .